Reference Library – USA – Vermont
In Vermont, a license is required for unarmed security guards. The Board of Private Investigative and Security Services makes the regulations regarding licensing. There are certain criteria that must be met before a license will be approved.
The hiring company is responsible for submitting the application.
Basic requirements for unarmed security guards in Vermont:
- Be at least 18 years old
- Valid Social Security number
- Driver s License
- Finger print cards (1)
- Certificate of completion of 40-hours of classroom training
- Mentally competent
- Provide character references
- No drug or alcohol use or dependence
- Must successfully pass a drug test
- No felony convictions
- No disabilities that would prevent performance of duty
- Submit to criminal background check
A basic training must be conducted by a board-approved instructor with at least two years experience in the subject matter.
Topics may include but is not limited to the following:
(1) Role of Private Security
(2) Legal Aspects
(3) Patrol and Observation
(4) Incident Response
(5) Security Resources: Surveillance operation and documentation
(6) Customer Service Issues: Working with and addressing the public
(7) First Aid Overview
(8) Report Writing
For more information, please consult the Board of Private Investigative and Security Services Rules1 or call (802) 828-1505.
Search for security guard training company in your area!
- ^ Board of Private Investigative and Security Services Rules (vtprofessionals.org)
Back on Tuesday, Nov.
23, a state worker grabbed at the camera of KOB-TV reporter Gadi Schwartz 1while the reporter shot videotape outside the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) Building in downtown Santa Fe. During the fracas, the state employee fell down and one of his associates told Schwartz to leave the premises, saying, This is not public property; this is state property.
A security guard later tried to evict Schwartz from the vicinity uttering the same phrase.
Schwartz was covering a story concerning the discovery of bones by a construction crew 2outside the PERA Building and had earlier spoken to a member of the Santa Fe Police Department on camera about the discovery. Schwartz tried to explain that he had permission from the police officer to shoot video of the scene but the state employee insisted that Schwartz leave, as did a security officer who arrived after the state employee fell to the ground while attempting to grab Schwartz camera.
Here it is:
After the incident with the state employee, Schwartz called the police.
New Mexico State Police Lt. Eric Garcia, who reviewed the video, said assault and battery charges will be filed against the state employee. The initial evidence reviewed by investigators, Garcia said, makes it clear that not only was Schwartz physically assaulted, he was clearly in a public area he had every right to be in.
No word yet if the state employee who grabbed the camera has been disciplined.
Opinion: The Orwellian This is not public property; this is state property is an instant classic.
Unfortuntely, it reflects a disturbing trend among too many public officials, public servants and security personnel who seem to lose sight of whom they are supposed represent, protect and to answer to.
As a journalist, Gadi Schwartz has no more rights than the average citizen but he certainly does not have any fewer rights. He was covering a story on state property and was not taping anything that was not already roped off by Santa Fe police.
Considering how aggressive the state employee who initially assaulted him acted, it appears Schwartz showed remarkable restraint. Think to yourself: If somone grabbed you while you were doing your job, would you have reacted as cooly as Schwartz did, telling the offender, Hey, man, you need to take it easy ?
I m not sure I would have.
And the nonsensical reasoning of the security officer who arrives later is maddening. Schwartz was not interfering with any state employees from doing their jobs. And the fact that Schwartz was the victim and had called police to report the incident never seems to have entered the security officer s mind.
And her interpretation that Schwartz doing his job as a reporter somehow places him in the category of a vendor is ridiculous.
The attitude that public property is somehow less than public points to a troubling tendency of late and, especially in an age of telephone cameras and Flip cameras, perhaps local state and federal authorities need to remind their employees more explicitly about the basic, individual and Constitutional rights of the citizens they are paid to serve.
For example, there was this incident in El Paso:
And this summer, there were instances of security preventing reporters from shooting video and covering the BP oil spill along public beaches5 on the gulf coast. Here s a link of one incident recorded by WDSU-TV in New Orleans: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fMTp9hCgWI6
and another incident involving CBS News:
Or this incident in Albuquerque two years ago:
And it s not just journalists. There are plenty of incidents of authorities ordering ordinary citizens to leave public property, seizing and prohibiting the taking of photographs and videotape at public events in the public square, and generally trying to put public events under lockdown.
This is partly why I post stories listing Monuments to Me, 10examples I find of politicians who while still in office, still acting as public servants have public buildings, ballparks, courthouses, gymnasiums, etc. named after them.
Besides the self-glorification aspect, it shows a distortion of the the idea of who serves whom.
After all, you ve never heard of a billionaire naming a wing of his mansion after the maid or butler.
So why do some public servants half-expect that their work should be so recognized?
- ^ KOB-TV reporter Gadi Schwartz (www.kob.com)
- ^ a story concerning the discovery of bones by a construction crew (www.abqjournal.com)
- ^ Santa Fe New Mexican (http)
- ^ New Mexican (http)
- ^ security preventing reporters from shooting video and covering the BP oil spill along public beaches (http)
- ^ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fMTp9hCgWI (www.youtube.com)
- ^ Democratic National Convention in Denver (www.denver.org)
- ^ Bob Who are you?
- ^ The Cato Institute also lists some examples involving average citizens here (http)
- ^ Monuments to Me, (http)
CHARLOTTE, Vt. Oct 25 2010 — Police said a security guard in Charlotte, Vt., was in cahoots with two robbers who he said held him up at gunpoint while he was removing money from a safe at the Lake Champlain Transportation Ferry Docks.
Patrick Risley, 20, a security guard with Censor Security, told police that he was robbed by two men wearing ski masks shortly before 4 a.m. Thursday, according to a police press release.
Risley said that the men fled from the scene on foot with an unknown amount of money. Police said that a later interview with Risley revealed that he had planned the robbery with 23-year-old Matthew Duval and 19-year-old Shawn Cochran and that the men planned to split the stolen money. Police said they found about 80 percent of the stolen money during a search of Risley’s vehicle and Duval and Cochran’s residences.
Risley was arrested Friday and charged with accessory aiding in a felony, false alarm to agencies of public safety, possession of marijuana and possession of stolen property. He was processed at the Williston State Police Barracks and held at the Chittenden County Correctional Facility. Duval and Cochran were both arrested Saturday and were charged with armed robbery and possession of stolen property.
Duval and Cochran were processed at the Williston State Police Barracks and held at the Chittenden County Correctional Facility.
All three individuals are scheduled for arraignment at the Chittenden County District Court on Monday.