Regions Security, a Miami-based security services firm with more than 300 employees and heavyweight clients such as Marriott, Hilton, and Cushman & Wakefield is launching Regions Guns & Ammo on May 8. The firearms outlet, located at 1100 NW 77nd avenue will be an integral component of the firm s expansion plans, said president and CEO Carlos Rivero, who is opening the gun store seven years after founding Regions Security.
We are trying to be a one-stop solution, so we decided to open the shop, said Rivero, noting the gun shop is located in the same building as the Regions Security headquarters.
The gun shop will comprise a huge arsenal including everything that you can think of, Rivero said. That includes local merchandise and online access to every type of firearm, ammunition and accessories.
The online store will be equipped to sell over the country, he said, offering customers some of the best prices in town. More importantly, he is offering a first-of-its-kind discount to any public service employee in addition to discounts provided to prior or active military personnel, fire and police departments.
We want to show some gratitude for what they do every day, said Rivero, a veteran who served in the Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom military operations campaigns.
A veteran-owned business, Regions Security was voted one of the region s fastest growing companies by the South Florida Business Journal in 2016. It continues to expand its vertical and geographic markets, with contracts reaching from Monroe County to north of Jupiter in Palm Beach County.
The firm s connection to the community goes well beyond its varied security services. Rivero is a big believer in corporate responsibility and giving back. Best Buddies, The Miami Rescue Mission, the Wounded Warrior Project, the American Red Cross, and the Military Affairs Advisory Board are among the organizations it has active partnerships with.
Regions Security serves more than 200 properties, and offers the gamut of 24-hour security and asset protection work: vehicle patrols, armed and unarmed security guards, CCTV and electronic surveillance, hospitality training, alarm response, and parking and valet services.
Rivero expects the firm s laser-like focus on customer service and exclusive training programs to help fuel the success of the gun shop, he said, adding the firm is also eyeing national expansion through its online store.
We are making sure that we have the best available types of firearms that are out there we want to be considered a premier store, he said, adding that his shop in a corner building right off the main highway makes it one of the city s most centrally-located gun stores.
Facility manager Alejandro Gonzalez will oversee its many services for the security community, in addition to the sale of weapons.
What makes us different is that we also have a security academy where customers can get concealed weapons permits and security licensing, said Rivero. Everything can be done right here. We provide the training and certification.
Connect To Your Customers & Grow Your Business
Woman forced to strip by airport security and show surgery scars after dramatic transformation thanks to 17-stone …
Fionna Murray had seven operations to remove sagging skin after going from 26 stone to 13st in four years
A WOMAN who shed half her weight had to show passport inspectors surgery scars as they did not believe the photo was of her. Fionna Murray has had seven operations to remove sagging skin after going from 26 stone to 13st in four years.
News Group Newspapers Ltd
Fionna Murray had to show passport inspectors surgery scars as they did not believe her passport photo was of her
After the latest op she was forced to strip from the waist up in a room at Izmir airport in Turkey while trying to return home to Deptford, South East London. Fionna, 28, said: I felt violated and victimised.
I was distraught. It was an invasion of my personal space.
News Group Newspapers Ltd
Fionna shed an astonishing amount of weight, going from 26 stone to 13st in just four years
I didn t know these people and I was just trying to go home.
I felt horrible. I felt like they were laughing at me.
News Group Newspapers Ltd
Following the weight loss, Fionna Fionna Murray had to have seven operations to remove sagging skin
bizarre MADDIE CLAIMS
Controversial Portuguese ex-police chief claims ‘MI5 hid Madeleine McCann’s body in cover-up after her parents killed her’
Heart-warming moment London Marathon runner collapses just 200 yards from finish – and is helped over the line by fellow competitor in ‘Jonny Brownlee moment’
GYPSY CAMP MURDER
Man and woman charged after traveller shot dead and sister’s thumbs almost severed at ‘Dale Farm II camp’
‘MADDIE WAS NOT SNATCHED IN ROOM’
Shocking new theory claims Maddie left apartment looking for her parents
WHY DOES IT ALWAYS REIGN ON ME?
Kate looks unimpressed as cheeky marathon runners squirt her and Prince William with water (but gets a sneaky kiss afterwards)
American Airlines steward banned from cabin after he ‘whacked’ sobbing mum as she held twins then challenged another passenger to a FIGHT
BEACH TO BENEFITS
Peru two drugs mule Michaella McCollum at dole office days after sunning herself on holidays in Ibiza and Marbella
ISIS threaten to behead hacker who planted porn on 250 jihadi Twitter accounts
THE END OF THE WORLD
North Korea could wipe out the world with just THREE NUKES brags Kim’s man in the West
‘New Madeleine McCann lead to be revealed this weekend’ says Aussie film crew
ARE YOU THE LUCKY WINNER?
Winning Lotto numbers for Saturday 22 April 2017 5.4million jackpot
Marine Le Pen says she wants to free France from the arrogant elite as she takes one step closer to French presidency by storming into the second round against Emmanuel Macron
Stripper’s face broken in three places by ‘racist’ strip club punter who punched her after she refused to have sex with him
KING OF THE PORKIES
Kim Jong-un all smiles on visit to pig processing plant – as we run down the tubby tyrant’s most outrageous lies
SEX FOR RENT
We uncover the seedy culture of rogue landlords trading sex with young women for free accommodation
SENT HOME TO DIE
Heartbreak of young mum told nothing more can be done for her baby born with a brain OUTSIDE her skull
‘we will find them’
Murder probe launched after former naval officer, 35, is run over and killed trying to stop thieves stealing his car
‘I’LL SMASH THEIR CAMERAS’
Gangster ‘who was target in Rhys Jones murder’ slams Little Boy Blue ITV drama about shooting
THE HUNT GOES ON
Get the lowdown on the latest developments in the Madeleine McCann case
SICK HATE CRIME
Woman’s teeth are KNOCKED OUT by ‘gang of 15 men who attacked lesbians’
News Group Newspapers Ltd
News Group Newspapers Ltd
Fionna was forced to strip from the waist up in a room at Izmir airport in Turkey while trying to return home to Deptford
Fiona continued: I removed my top and they could see the bandages on my arms from the skin removal surgery.
They never apologised. In the end they just said, come on let s go, your flight is about to leave.
I felt like they dragged out a process and were abusing their power. The whole ordeal was so unnecessary.
News Group Newspapers Ltd
Fionna added: My weight loss journey has seen me come a long way and these people were questioning me as a person
Fionna has used the 2013 passport twice before in Turkey as well as for holidays to the USA, Germany and Italy. Airport officials did not respond to requests for comment.
She added: My weight loss journey has seen me come a long way and these people were questioning me as a person.
I didn t think the passport picture looked too different from me facially.
When President Trump and the Republican majorities in Congress swept away privacy rules preventing your internet service providers from selling your data without your permission, you might think Fletcher Kittredge would want to celebrate. Kittredge, after all, is founder and CEO of Biddeford-based GWI, an internet service provider that serves more than 18,000 Maine customers and would benefit from the repeal, which lets companies like his sell his customer s Web browsing history, geo-location movements, and all sorts of other valuable information to advertisers. The rules, repeal advocates said, had put more stringent restrictions on such firms than are applied to Web-based companies like Facebook or Google.
HOW TO PROTECT YOURSELF
Privacy experts say there are ways to make it harder for internet service providers and Web companies to snoop on your online activity. Use privacy-enchanced browsers TOR, a free browser created by volunteers, makes it harder to track your movements on the internet.
Opt out of being tracked Most ISPs allow you to opt out of some of the ways they track your data and feed you ads. Virtual Private Network A subscription service that creates an encrypted tunnel for your internet activity, but you have to trust your VPN not to snoop on you. Pick an ISP that doesn t collect data Some ISPs don t, but you have to live in a town they happen to serve. Check their privacy policies.
But Kittredge says the repeal is a disaster for his customers and anyone who cares about privacy or civil liberties, an ill-conceived move that will ultimately make people s data less secure and the internet itself less valuable.
ISPs have broader access to information about you than anybody else because everything else goes on top of the connection they provide, he says. They can tell who you re having conversations with, where you go, and lots of information that s best left private, especially as hackers will be attracted to it.
If we all end up not being able to appropriately trust the internet, that s not good for anyone. The rule repeal which the president signed into law April 3 will make most things we do on the internet much less private, privacy experts say, as providers learn how to make money selling their customers data. For years prior to the repeal, providers had been expecting tightened rules and had set their policies to anticipate this, but now are free to exploit data more aggressively. This has implications for Maine internet users and national policymakers alike. Proponents of the repeal said it was necessary to create an even playing field between internet service providers and other Web-based companies, but the practical effect so far has been to shift the balance in favor of service providers, who can now operate with far fewer privacy restrictions.
There are no rules here now, says lawyer Peter Guffin, who heads Pierce Atwood s privacy and data security practice and teaches information privacy law at the University of Maine School of Law. There s a complete vacuum in terms of when an ISP can see into the contents of our communications, what it can do with those contents, and even whether it has to tell us if this data has been hacked.
From a user s perspective, you should be on notice that the ISPs have been given the green light by the U.S. government to essentially surveil all of your electronic communications, Guffin added. My hunch is that many providers are rewriting their privacy notices, and whatever they said about opting out won t be the same as a year ago.
Internet providers can see a wide range of their customers online activity, according to Jeremy Gillula, senior staff technologist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the San Francisco-based digital civil liberties group. Unless you re using special tools like a virtual private network or the free, privacy-minded Tor internet browser, he says, an ISP could definitely see and sell all the web addresses you visit, though they would be limited to the domain name for https sites using encryption, such as banks, most online shopping sites, Google, Facebook, and Web mail. They can also gather your geo-location data especially interesting for mobile internet and could glean what songs you ve been listening to, movies you ve watched, or items you ve shopped for from any unencrypted addresses you ve visited. While they can also see the content of emails in accounts they provide their users, wiretapping laws likely prevent them from sharing or selling this information.
Reducing exposure to snooping
There are steps Mainers can take to reduce their exposure, says Zachary Heiden, legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Maine. One is to use the Tor browser (download the Tor browser here) though it will slow down your internet traffic and encrypted text messaging tools like Signal (download Signal here).
That will at least protect the content of your communications, he says. But it doesn t protect the metadata the digital equivalent of a letter s envelope, with sender, receiver, time stamp, and size information about the text. Users can also ask their ISPs to opt them out of at least some of their data being shared, though this process is often cumbersome. An ACLU colleague of mine who is an expert on internet privacy tried as an exercise to contact different ISPs and exercise the opt-out option and found it incredibly challenging and confusing and this is somebody who studies technology for a living, he says. But if you care about privacy and don t want your personal browsing history stored, commodified, and sold then it may be worth it for you to take those steps to opt out. More sophisticated users may consider subscribing to a virtual private networking or VPN service, which masks much of one s internet activity from your service provider, but experts say that comes with its own risks, as the VPN provider may be snooping on you itself.
There s a strong overlap between VPN companies and the dark web, because a lot of people who want to hide things this way are also doing something wrong, says Kittredge. It can be like hiring a security guard to protect your warehouse by going to the local bar and picking out somebody who looks tough.
A fourth possibility, depending on your geographic location: Vote with your wallets and choose ISPs that are protective of your privacy, Heiden says. Most ISPs active in Maine are seeking to reassure customers about their commitment to their privacy, but on closer scrutiny, the strength of their stated commitments varies considerably. Another unknown is what lawmakers will do next.
Repeal s goal: An even playing field
Congress repealed the privacy rules the Federal Communications Commission was about to put into effect that would have prohibited internet providers from selling or sharing a wide range of personal data without users consent, including Web browsing history, geo-location, and application usage. It was a party-line vote, with Sen. Susan Collins and Rep. Bruce Poliquin voting with their Republican colleagues for repeal, independent Sen. Angus King, Democratic Rep. Chellie Pingree and the entire Democratic caucus voting against. The action also prevents the FCC the only entity currently authorized to regulate ISPs from developing new rules. Supporters of repeal say it was necessary to create an even playing field between ISPs and other internet firms like Google and Facebook. The FCC rules on internet providers were stricter than those for Web-based firms and application developers, which are regulated by a different agency, the Federal Trade Commission. Opponents reject this as a false comparison.
Poliquin says that repealing the rule will enhance privacy. I absolutely want to ensure there are proper safeguards to keep Mainers private data secure when they use the Internet, which is why I voted with Senator Collins to remove this FCC rule, he said in a written statement to the Maine Sunday Telegram. The reality is that the FCC rule creates a misleading sense of security for users because they applied to only a specific segment of the industry, while giving unequal advantage and preference to a handful of companies that wouldn t be under their jurisdiction. This is not the way to regulate, as it would also undermine the very goal of protecting users data. His vote, he added, was the right thing to do. According to data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics, internet firms have not been important campaign donors to either Collins or Poliquin. No member of the industry appears in the top 20 donors to either s campaign or the political action committees they control.
Users don t pay Google, Facebook
The most prominent lobbyist pushing for the changes is Jon Leibowitz, who was chairman of the Federal Trade Commission under President Obama, and now co-chairman of the 21st Century Privacy Coalition, which represents Comcast, Time Warner Cable (now Spectrum), Verizon, DirecTV and other major internet providers who disliked the restrictions. In interviews with the Telegram, Leibowitz defended the rule change on fairness grounds. The whole history of American privacy protection is focused on three things: the data itself, the way in which it s collected, and the way in which it s used, he said. You shouldn t discriminate on the basis of silos, on the basis of who is doing the collecting. ISPs, he and other proponents of the repeal argue, should be on an even playing field with other internet firms in terms of exploiting users digital data. But repeatedly asked why internet service providers should necessarily operate under the same rules as Web companies, he was unable to provide a clear answer. It s not about who is collecting your data, it s about what data is being collected and how it is being used, he reiterated, adding that he thought you could make a fair apples to apples comparison between ISPs and other internet firms.
Elsewhere he has argued that ISPs don t really have a comprehensive picture of our internet use, both because they can t see the content of browsing at https sites and because customers roam from ISP to ISP during the day, connecting at work or the local coffee shop. Opponents of the rule change disagree, arguing there is a fundamental difference between the companies we pay to provide us internet access and those like Google and Facebook that are paid by advertisers for information about who we are and what products we might like. For internet service providers, they say, their users are their customers, while for Google and Facebook their users are the product they re selling to their real customers, marketers and advertisers.
It s a little disingenuous for ISPs to argue they should be treated equally, because it s not really comparing apples to apples, Pierce Atwood s Guffin says. Unlike using Google, which is free, I m actually paying my ISP 50 bucks a month to get that ISP connection, and now I find out all my data is also being monetized and leveraged to make more money. ISPs, he says, are more akin to the postal service a conduit through which we conduct our digital lives, and one you can t avoid having, which is why European regulations prohibit such firms from collecting user data. Nor do most Maine consumers have a lot of options, as many communities are served by just one or two providers. It s an essential service, and there aren t hundreds of ISPs that are knocking at my door for business, he adds.
Heiden at the ACLU of Maine agrees. The rules should be different, because ISPs are literally invited into our home and provide a service that is almost necessary for participating in the public and economic life of our country, he says. That carries with it a social responsibility that s different than that of the Web companies we may choose to visit through the internet.
It s unclear how or when privacy rules will be replaced
In the short term, the repeal has also created a profoundly uneven playing field, as ISPs are now far less regulated than other firms. It is unclear how and when Congress will move to rectify the situation, given that the FCC still has authority over the ISPs yet is barred from developing privacy regulations. Some backers of the repeal appear concerned about the vacuum. On April 7, 50 Republican House members wrote the FCC chairman to urge him to continue to hold ISPs to their privacy promises laid out in the privacy policies they present their users. The letter also suggested the FCC should turn regulation of ISPs over to the FTC. (Poliquin was not a signatory.)
But Gillula of the Electronic Frontier Foundation says that s not reassuring, as many major ISPs privacy policies allow them to collect your browsing history and target ads at you unless you opt out, something most users are unaware they can do. Basically, the letter is kind of like asking the FCC to ensure that the fox guarding the henhouse stands by the contract he imposed on the hens, which says in fine print that he s allowed to eat one or two of them now and then, he says. It s also possible that the Maine Legislature could try to impose its own rules, though this might be tested in court. This is all uncharted waters, says Guffin. But if you have Congress saying we re not regulating ISPs, it may create an opening for states to step in.
Colin Woodard can be contacted at:
- ^ swept away privacy rules (www.pressherald.com)
- ^ rule repeal (www.pressherald.com)
- ^ Tor internet browser (www.torproject.org)
- ^ download the Tor browser here (www.torproject.org)
- ^ download Signal here (whispersystems.org)
- ^ experts say (krebsonsecurity.com)
- ^ [email protected] (www.pressherald.com)