News by Professionals 4 Professionals

israel

Former Israeli airport-security boss: ‘I don’t quite understand the decision’ to ban electronics on flights

Former Israeli Airport-security Boss: 'I Don't Quite Understand The Decision' To Ban Electronics On FlightsA board listing flight schedules is seen at Ben Gurion International airport Thomson Reuters

JERUSALEM (Reuters) – Even in Israel, renowned for its aviation security, a carry-on electronics ban on flights to the United States and Britain from parts of the Middle East and North Africa had a former airport security chief shaking his head on Wednesday.

“I don’t quite understand the decision,” said Pini Schiff, former head of security at Tel Aviv’s Ben-Gurion airport, pointing to security gaps in the new rules that anyone aiming to smuggle explosives on to a commercial airliner might exploit. Under the regulations announced on Tuesday, electronic devices larger than cellphones are banned from the passenger cabins of planes flying directly from at least 10 airports in 10 Muslim-majority nations. Schiff said that still leaves open the possibility of hiding explosives in a device packed in luggage in the hold of an aircraft, or smuggling a bomb into the seating area of a connecting flight to the United States or Britain.

“What can explode in the plane while it’s in a passenger’s hands can also explode in a cargo hold, because if you put a timer or a barometric pressure switch on it, you endanger the flight to the same degree,” he told Reuters.

Recalling the destruction of Pan Am 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland in 1988 by a bomb that Libyan agents hid in a radio-cassette recorder in the jumbo jet’s hold, Schiff said electronic devices like laptops and iPads have long been subject to scrutiny at airports around the world.

Former Israeli Airport-security Boss: 'I Don't Quite Understand The Decision' To Ban Electronics On FlightsREUTERS/Ronen Zvulun

But Schiff said, “there are airports in the world where the level of screening and expertise of the screeners is not that high, and subsequently there is a level of risk here.” As an example, he said the level of security at Istanbul’s Ataturk airport was lower than that at airports in western Europe. Not so, Schiff said, when it comes to Ben-Gurion airport.

“Screeners at Ben-Gurion attend a course lasting several months until they are certified to operate a screening device. Things are different overseas. I don’t want to disparage anyone, but it’s different,” he said.

Tight security

For departing passengers, the airport experience at Ben-Gurion is a combination of high-tech and thinly disguised profiling. Before reaching the main terminal, vehicles stop briefly at a security checkpoint at the airport’s entrance, where guards signal drivers to roll down their window – a procedure hard to put into effect at busier and larger airports around the world.

The guards expect the car’s occupants to reply in kind to a proffered greeting of “shalom”, or hello the better to detect an Arab or foreign accent. Small stationary cameras point at license plates, apparently checking numbers against a data base. Other plainclothes guards are stationed at the doors to the terminal.

Former Israeli Airport-security Boss: 'I Don't Quite Understand The Decision' To Ban Electronics On FlightsEl Al planes are seen parked at Israel’s Ben-Gurion International Airport near Tel Aviv, during a strike by airline workers, April 21, 2013. REUTERS/Nir Elias

Once inside, departing passengers stand in line with their baggage and passports and answer questions like “who packed your bags?” Foreigners are asked who they met during their visit, and about their broad background. In departure area security lines, laptops but not tablets must be taken out of bags and placed on trays for electronic screening. Shoes, belts and watches usually stay on.

Luggage heading to the hold gets special scrutiny.

“At Ben-Gurion, we have been operating an HBS Hold Baggage Screening system for the past two years that examines 100 percent of the baggage of departing passengers … it works on the same principle as medical CT scans,” Schiff said, referring to computerized tomography that combines a series of X-ray images taken from different angles.

“A suitcase that is not cleared 100 percent does not make it to the plane.”

(By Jeffrey Heller; editing by Luke Baker and Mark Trevelyan)

Former Israeli airport security boss: electronics ban makes little …

A board listing flight schedules is seen at Ben Gurion International airport, near Tel Aviv July 24, 2014. REUTERS/Baz Ratner

By Jeffrey Heller[1] | JERUSALEM

JERUSALEM Even in Israel, renowned for its aviation security, a carry-on electronics ban on flights to the United States and Britain from parts of the Middle East and North Africa had a former airport security chief shaking his head on Wednesday.

“I don’t quite understand the decision,” said Pini Schiff, former head of security at Tel Aviv’s Ben-Gurion airport, pointing to security gaps in the new rules that anyone aiming to smuggle explosives on to a commercial airliner might exploit.

Under the regulations announced on Tuesday, electronic devices larger than cellphones are banned from the passenger cabins of planes flying directly from at least 10 airports in 10 Muslim-majority nations.

Schiff said that still leaves open the possibility of hiding explosives in a device packed in luggage in the hold of an aircraft, or smuggling a bomb into the seating area of a connecting flight to the United States or Britain.

“What can explode in the plane while it’s in a passenger’s hands can also explode in a cargo hold, because if you put a timer or a barometric pressure switch on it, you endanger the flight to the same degree,” he told Reuters.

Recalling the destruction of Pan Am 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland in 1988 by a bomb that Libyan agents hid in a radio-cassette recorder in the jumbo jet’s hold, Schiff said electronic devices like laptops and iPads have long been subject to scrutiny at airports around the world.

But Schiff said, “there are airports in the world where the level of screening and expertise of the screeners is not that high, and subsequently there is a level of risk here”. As an example, he said the level of security at Istanbul’s Ataturk airport was lower than that at airports in western Europe.

Not so, Schiff said, when it comes to Ben-Gurion airport.

“Screeners at Ben-Gurion attend a course lasting several months until they are certified to operate a screening device. Things are different overseas. I don’t want to disparage anyone, but it’s different,” he said.

TIGHT SECURITY

For departing passengers, the airport experience at Ben-Gurion is a combination of high-tech and thinly disguised profiling.

Before reaching the main terminal, vehicles stop briefly at a security checkpoint at the airport’s entrance, where guards signal drivers to roll down their window – a procedure hard to put into effect at busier and larger airports around the world.

The guards expect the car’s occupants to reply in kind to a proffered greeting of “shalom”, or hello – the better to detect an Arab or foreign accent. Small stationary cameras point at license plates, apparently checking numbers against a data base.

Other plainclothes guards are stationed at the doors to the terminal.

Once inside, departing passengers stand in line with their baggage and passports and answer questions like “who packed your bags?” Foreigners are asked who they met during their visit, and about their broad background.

In departure area security lines, laptops – but not tablets – must be taken out of bags and placed on trays for electronic screening. Shoes, belts and watches usually stay on.

Luggage heading to the hold gets special scrutiny.

“At Ben-Gurion, we have been operating an HBS – Hold Baggage Screening – system for the past two years that examines 100 percent of the baggage of departing passengers … it works on the same principle as medical CT scans,” Schiff said, referring to computerized tomography that combines a series of X-ray images taken from different angles.

“A suitcase that is not cleared 100 percent does not make it to the plane.”

(Editing by Luke Baker and Mark Trevelyan)

Next In World News

Former Israeli Airport Security Boss: Electronics Ban Makes Little ...

Police arrest two more over British parliament attack

LONDON British police said they had made two further significant arrests in the investigation into the attack on London’s parliament and gave the birth name of the man behind the assault as Adrian Russell Ajao.

Former Israeli Airport Security Boss: Electronics Ban Makes Little ...

North Korea maintains readiness for nuclear test at any time: South Korea

SEOUL North Korea has maintained readiness to conduct a new nuclear test at any time, a South Korean military official said on Friday, amid a report of a possible test within days as Pyongyang defies international pressure.

References

  1. ^ Jeffrey Heller (www.reuters.com)

NCAA reportedly made writer delete video of Gregg Marshall’s wife

NCAA Reportedly Made Writer Delete Video Of Gregg Marshall's Wife

Dec 22, 2016; Wichita, KS, USA; Wichita State Shockers head coach Gregg Marshall reacts to a call during the first half against the South Dakota State Jackrabbits at Charles Koch Arena. Peter G. Aiken-USA TODAY Sports

The NCAA reportedly made a writer delete a video he posted of Gregg Marshall s wife going crazy during the Kentucky-Wichita State NCAA Tournament game on Sunday, though Marshall s wife later ended up kicked out of her seat. Kentucky Sports Radio s Drew Franklin, who, yes, as you probably guessed, writes for a Kentucky fan site, shared on Twitter a video of Marshall s wife Lynn going crazy during the game. The video went viral and reached Lynn, who then tried to get the credentialed Franklin kicked out of the game. Franklin then said that an NCAA rep told him he couldn t tweet about Marshall s wife anymore. Here s what he wrote in his story on the matter[1]:

Someone from the NCAA came and got my name and told me I could no longer tweet about her because it made her upset. I guess it didn t make anyone else upset when she told Malik Monk to get in the weight room or told Isaiah Briscoe to buy some bigger shorts or told Calipari to shut the f up or told Roger Ayers he is garbage or any of the other classy things she yelled between F-bombs.

Franklin says he got into trouble after the game when the NCAA approached him and told him to delete the video, which he did. He later decided to re-post it. You can see the video here[2] and will notice that a security guard was trying to get her to calm down.

It turns out that Marshall s wife, not Franklin, really was wrong, and that the NCAA should not have tried to influence Franklin s behavior. The AP later reported that security asked Marshall to leave her seat[3] in the lower bowl because she was cursing and loud. A police officer was called to help escort her out of the lower bowl. Her husband’s team ended up losing 65-62 to the Wildcats.

References

  1. ^ his story on the matter (kentuckysportsradio.com)
  2. ^ video here (kentuckysportsradio.com)
  3. ^ security asked Marshall to leave her seat (collegebasketball.ap.org)
1 2 3 54